Thin Authorisation Packets
Reconstructive requests submitted without photographs, measurements, or failed treatment history.
The fixBuild a standard evidence packet and submit it with every reconstructive request.
Reconstructive cases approved, cosmetic revenue collected cleanly
Plastic surgery runs two businesses side by side. Reconstructive work needs insurers convinced with photographs, measurements, and documented failed treatment. Cosmetic work needs money collected before the patient reaches theatre. Mixing the two costs you approvals on one side and cash on the other. We keep them cleanly separated.
Plastic surgery medical billing covers reconstructive and aesthetic procedures. Reconstructive work includes breast reconstruction, scar and wound repair, hand surgery, and correction after trauma or cancer treatment.
The dividing line is function versus appearance, and insurers examine it closely. A procedure that improves function or corrects a deformity may be covered. The same operation performed for appearance is not. Proving which one you performed falls entirely on your documentation.
That proof is unusually visual. Photographs, measurements, and evidence of failed conservative treatment carry more weight here than a narrative alone. Meanwhile the cosmetic side operates as a cash business with its own collection discipline.
One side must convince an insurer. The other must collect before the operation.
Photographs and measurements often decide reconstructive authorisations more than the clinical narrative does.
Operations that look alike can be covered or excluded depending entirely on the documented indication.
Aesthetic cases need deposits, written estimates, and payment secured before the theatre date.
When covered and cosmetic work happen together, the charges and the patient's costs have to be separated.
Each one costs either an approval or a payment.
Reconstructive requests submitted without photographs, measurements, or failed treatment history.
The fixBuild a standard evidence packet and submit it with every reconstructive request.
A procedure billed as reconstructive when the note reads as appearance-driven.
The fixState the functional impairment being corrected, in the surgeon's own words.
Aesthetic patients reaching theatre without a deposit or full payment secured.
The fixTake payment at booking under a written estimate, not on the day of surgery.
Covered and cosmetic work billed together, so the insurer denies and the patient disputes.
The fixSplit the charges and give the patient a written breakdown before surgery.
Post-operative visits billed inside the surgical window and reversed months later.
The fixAttach the window to the patient record so reception sees it on arrival.
Patients not informed of reconstruction coverage they are entitled to after cancer surgery.
The fixConfirm the applicable coverage protections during the initial consultation.
Reconstructive and cosmetic cases follow separate paths.
At consultation each case is identified as reconstructive, cosmetic, or combined, which sets the entire path.
Reconstructive requests are assembled with photographs, measurements, and documented failed treatment.
Authorisations are pursued and tracked with expiry dates, and re-verified if surgery is rescheduled.
Aesthetic cases are quoted in writing and paid before the theatre date rather than afterwards.
Where both occur, covered and cosmetic portions are separated with a clear patient breakdown.
Global periods are logged, denials appealed with the evidence packet, and revenue reported by case type.
Cash collection support alongside insurance billing.
A general outline of plastic surgery coding.
| Range | What It Covers |
|---|---|
| 19316–19396 | Breast reconstruction and revision procedures |
| 14000–14350 | Adjacent tissue transfer and rearrangement |
| 15002–15278 | Skin grafts and wound preparation |
| 15570–15738 | Flap procedures by type and site |
| 26010–26989 | Hand and finger reconstructive surgery |
| 21120–21296 | Facial and craniofacial reconstruction |
| Group | Clinical Focus |
|---|---|
| C50 | Breast malignancy prompting reconstruction |
| Z42 | Encounter for reconstructive surgery aftercare |
| L90–L91 | Scarring and hypertrophic skin conditions |
| S00–S99 | Traumatic injury requiring repair |
| Q65–Q79 | Congenital deformities and malformations |
| L89 | Pressure ulcers by stage and site |
Note: This is general education on how plastic surgery coding is organised. Code sets and payer policies change often. Always check the current code set and the payer's active policy for the date of service.
We work inside the system your practice already runs.
Answers for reconstructive and aesthetic practices.
Visual evidence more than narrative. Photographs, measurements, and a documented history of failed conservative treatment carry the most weight with reviewers deciding whether a procedure is functional or cosmetic. Requests with only a clinical description are frequently denied. We build a standard evidence packet for each procedure type so nothing is missing when the request goes out.
State the impairment plainly and specifically. Describe what the patient cannot do, the symptoms involved, and what conservative treatment failed to resolve. Vague language about improvement invites a cosmetic determination. The surgeon's own words matter here, because reviewers look for a functional problem being corrected rather than an appearance being enhanced.
At booking, under a written estimate, never on the day of surgery. Cosmetic work is a cash business, and chasing payment afterwards has poor recovery rates once the procedure is complete. A deposit at scheduling with the balance due before the theatre date is standard practice. We support the estimate and the paperwork so your coordinator can be consistent.
By splitting the charges and telling the patient in advance. The covered portion goes to insurance with its own documentation, and the cosmetic portion is quoted and collected separately. Blending them causes the insurer to deny and the patient to dispute. A written breakdown before surgery prevents both, and it protects your relationship with the patient.
Federal law requires many plans covering mastectomy to also cover reconstruction, including procedures on the other breast for symmetry and treatment of resulting complications. Patients are frequently unaware. Confirming what applies at the consultation both serves the patient and prevents your practice from treating covered work as cosmetic. We check this during initial verification.
Usually global period billing. Routine post-operative visits are included in the surgical fee, and charging them separately gets paid initially then reversed on later review. Complications and unrelated care remain billable with the right modifier. We log every procedure date with its global length so returns are flagged at check-in rather than caught afterwards.
Consistently, and with the patient's consent recorded. Standardised views and lighting make the functional problem visible to a reviewer who has never met the patient. Inconsistent images weaken otherwise strong requests. Store them securely as protected health information. We specify which views each procedure type needs so your staff can capture them the first time.
Yes, and the distinction is exactly the kind insurers scrutinise. One may be covered when documented functional problems such as recurrent skin breakdown are present and conservative treatment failed. The other is generally cosmetic. The operative note and the pre-operative documentation must clearly support which procedure was performed and why.
Yes, and they need different handling. Insurance work runs through verification, authorisation, and claim submission. Cosmetic work needs estimates, deposits, and payment tracking rather than claims. We manage both and report them separately, so you can see how each part of the practice is genuinely performing instead of looking at a blended figure.
Standardising the reconstructive evidence packet. Most denials on covered procedures come from incomplete submissions rather than genuinely uncovered work. Define exactly which photographs, measurements, and treatment history each procedure type needs, then submit that same packet every time. Approval rates rise noticeably within the first quarter, and nothing about your clinical practice has to change.
We review your denied reconstructive requests and show you exactly which evidence was missing, then help you build a packet that works.
Submit your details and our AAPC-certified billing auditors will coordinate a free operational audit for your clinic.
Prefer booking a direct 30-minute online calendar slot with our director of RCM?
Book Direct Meeting